Analisis Praksiologis Buku Teks Matematika: Mengenalkan Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar

Dede Fajriadi, Siti Fatimah, Didi Suryadi

Sari


Buku teks memiliki peranan yang sangat penting dalam menunjang proses pengetahuan siswa secara utuh. Penelitian tentang buku teks matematika telah berkembang untuk perbaikan proses pengajaran dan penyampaian materi kepada siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan karakteristik sajian buku teks pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar menggunakan teori prakseologi dengan empat elemen analisis, yaitu tugas, teknik, teknologi, dan teori.  Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan menganalisis buku teks siswa kelas IX terbitan Kemendikbud. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konten isi buku teks materi bangun ruang sisi datar sudah cukup baik. Materi bangun ruang sisi datar diperkenalkan dengan konteks sehari-hari. Namun, ada beberapa sajian yang perlu dilengkapi. Sajian teknik kurang lengkap dan tidak memberikan ruang bagi siswa untuk memilih cara menyelesaikan masalah bangun ruang sisi datar. beberapa catatan yang diperoleh ini dapat dijadikan bahan masukan untuk perbaikan buku teks di masa mendatang.Kata kunci: Bangun ruang sisi datar, buku teks, prakseologi

Referensi


Ain, N., & Kurniawati, M. (2012). Implementasi kurikulum KTSP: pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang, 3(2), 316–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/jip.v3i2.373

Azzahra, N. Herman, T., & Dasari D. (2022). Analysis of Inverse Proportion in Mathematics Textbook Based on Praxeological Theory. Jurnal Analisa, 8(2) (2022) 152-167.

Bernard, M., Nurmala, N., Mariam, S., & Rustyani, N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas IX Pada Materi Bangun Datar. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 2(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v2i2.1317.

Boaler, J., et al. "Everyday Mathematics: Geometric Reasoning in Life." Mathematical Thinking and Learning, vol. 8, no. 1, 2006, pp. 365-389.

Bosch, M., Gascón, J., & Trigueros, M. (2017). Dialogue between theories interpreted as research praxeologies: the case of APOS and the ATD. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9734-3.

Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing The Anthropological Theory of The Didactic: An Attempt at A Principled Approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71–114.

Chevallard, Y., Barquero, B., Bosch, M., & Florensa, I. (2022). Advances in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. In Advances in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76791-4.

Fuadiah, N. F., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2019). Teaching and learning activities in classroom and their impact on student misunderstanding: A case study on negative integers. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 407-424. https://doi.org/10. 29333/iji.2019.12127a.

Glasnovic Gracin, D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: a five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1431849.

Guerreiro, M. A. (2008). "Textbook Analysis: Methodological Reflections." ICME 11 Proceedings, Monterrey, Mexico.

Hadar, L. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn: mathematics textbooks and students’ achievements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.002.

Hayata, T., & Amori, S. (2019). Theory of geometrical thinking in elementary textbook: case study of Japan. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on MAthematicas Textbook Research and Development.

Hendriyanto, A., Suryadi, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Juandi, D. (2023). Praxeology review: Comparing Singaporean and Indonesian textbooks in introducing the concept of sets. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12953.

Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Wagner, D. (2007). A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics learner. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 16–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40248565.

Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). "Learning and Teaching with Understanding." Dalam D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, pp. 65-97.

Huntley, M. A. (2008). The Influence of Geometric Thinking on Communication Skills in Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 37(6): 323-331.

Johar, R., Yusniarti, S., & Saminan. (2018). The analysis of proportional reasoning problem in the Indonesian mathematics textbook for the junior high school. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4145.55-68 .

Johansson, M. (2003). Textbook Analysis and the Use of Textbooks in Classroom Studies. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 8(1): 7-31.

Kanbir, S. (2014). The Role of Geometry in the Transition to Higher-Level Mathematical Thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2): 273-297.

Katrin van den Ham, A., & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation Journal, 59(8), 133–140.

Kilhamn, C., Bråting, K., Helenius, O., & Mason, J. (2022). Variables in early algebra: exploring didactic potentials in programming activities. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01384-0.

Kajander, A., & Lovric, M. (2009). Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701691558.

Kristanto, A., Mustaji, Mariono, A., Sulistiowati, & Nuryati, D. W. (2018). Developing media module proposed to editor in editorial division. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947, 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012054.

Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning Over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4): 817-835.

Melani, R., & Herman, T. (2023). Evaluation of Learning Media (Textbooks) in Area of Square and Rectangle to Prepare Student in Problem Solving: Praxeological Analysis. PRISMA, 12(1), 40-48. DOI:10.35194/jp.v12i1.2887.

Pansell, A., & Boistrup, L. B. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ teaching practices in relation to textbooks: Exploring praxeologies. Mathematics Enthusiast, 15(3), 541–562.

Pingel, F. (2010). UNESCO Guidebook on Textbook Research and Textbook Revision. UNESCO.

Reys, R., Reys, B., Lapan, R., Holliday, G., & Wasman, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of standards-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034700.

Rezat, S. (2006). A Model of Textbook Use in the Mathematics Classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(6): 444-450.

Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press.

Sembiring, R. K., Hadi, S., & Dolk, M. (2008). Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(6), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0125-9.

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sianturi, I. A. J., Ismail, Z., & Yang, D. C. (2021). A crossnational comparison of mathematical problems on numbers and operations-related topics in five countries. School Science and Mathematics, 121(2), 72- 84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12451.

Sievert, H., van den Ham, A. K., Niedermeyer, I., & Heinze, A. (2019). Effects of mathematics textbooks on the development of primary school children’s adaptive expertise in arithmetic. Learning and Individual Differences, 74(2019), 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.006.

Suryadi, D., Itoh, T., & Isnarto. (2023). A prospective mathematics teacher’s lesson planning: An in-depth analysis from the anthropological theory of the didactic. Journal on Mathematics Education. 14(4), 723-740.

Takeuchi, H., & Shinno, Y. (2020). Comparing the Lower Secondary Textbooks of Japan and England : a Praxeological Analysis of Symmetry and Transformations in Geometry. 791–810.

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research." Educational Psychology Review, 22(3): 271-296

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Weinberg, A., & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9264-3.

Wijayanti, D. (2019). Linking proportionality of arithmetic, algebra and geometry domains in Indonesian lower secondary textbooks. Educação Matemática Pesquisa : Revista Do Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados Em Educação Matemática, 21(4), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2019v21i4p074-084.

Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. (2017). An analysis of Singaporean versus Indonesian textbooks based on trigonometry content. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3829–3848. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00760a.

Zakiah, N. E. (2020). Level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 132-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.30458.

Zakiah, N. E., & Fajriadi, D. (2020b). Management of authentic assessment in mathematics lessons to develop 4C skills. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1613 012050. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012050.

Zakiah, N. E., Fatimah, A. T., & Sunaryo, Y. (2020c). Implementasi project-based learning untuk mengeksplorasi kreativitas dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis mahasiswa. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 5(2), 285–293. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v5i2.4194.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v10i1.17943

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##

Laman Teorema: https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/teorema/index

Terindek: