KESENJANGAN IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PENATAAN JARINGAN UTILITAS UDARA DAN RISIKO KESELAMATAN PUBLIK DI KAWASAN KETINTANG KOTA SURABAYA

Ahmad Yusroni, Rizkia Alifa Wardani, Aqila Avrilia Putri Herlambang, Felita Ermo Harvani, Haryo Kunto Wibisono, Weni Rosdiana

Sari


Penataan jaringan utilitas udara memerlukan keterhubungan antara standar, identifikasi aset, pembagian peran, tindakan, dan umpan balik. Penelitian ini menganalisis kesenjangan implementasi kebijakan di koridor Ketintang, mendeskripsikan persepsi pengguna secara eksploratif, dan merumuskan rekomendasi administratif. Studi kasus deskriptif menggunakan observasi terstruktur pada enam titik, Survei 1 terhadap 15 responden dengan sepuluh butir skala 1-4, serta analisis regulasi dan literatur. Data survei diolah melalui frekuensi, mean, simpangan baku sampel, persentase skor 3-4, dan grand mean. Hasil menunjukkan dua titik berisiko skrining tinggi dan empat titik sedang. Grand mean mencapai 3,413; sebanyak 92,0% dari 150 respons butir bernilai 3-4. Kesenjangan terutama terdapat pada keterlacakan jaringan, penugasan kasus, dokumentasi pengawasan, dan umpan balik, bukan pada ketiadaan aturan. Safe Utility Corridor direkomendasikan sebagai alur audit, registrasi, penugasan, tindakan proporsional, dan pemantauan. Temuan menegaskan pentingnya tindak lanjut yang terverifikasi. Model belum diterapkan; temuan tidak digeneralisasi di luar titik dan responden penelitian. Kata Kunci : Implementasi Kebijakan; Jaringan Utilitas; Keselamatan Publik; Ketintang

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Buku :

Adebiyi, J., Anspach, J., & Sturgill, R. (2025). Evaluating completeness and positional accuracy of traditional utility records compared to subsurface utility engineering: A comparative case study analysis. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 32, 101539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101539

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Biersteker, E., Koppenjan, J., & van Marrewijk, A. (2021). Translating the invisible: Governing underground utilities in the Amsterdam Airport Schiphol terminal project. International Journal of Project Management, 39(6), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.04.003

Biersteker, E., & van Marrewijk, A. (2023). Integrating knowledge in infrastructure projects: The interplay between formal and informal knowledge governance mechanisms. Construction Management and Economics, 41(10), 859-874. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2210695

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432

Buntaine, M. T., Hunnicutt, P., & Komakech, P. (2021). The challenges of using citizen reporting to improve public services: A field experiment on solid waste services in Uganda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa026

Clements, R., Alizadeh, T., Searle, G., & Legacy, C. (2024). Meaningful public accountability in collaborative infrastructure governance: Lessons from Sydney’s Western Parkland City. Urban Policy and Research, 42(3), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2024.2340448

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daulat, S., Rokstad, M. M., Klein-Paste, A., Langeveld, J., & Tscheikner-Gratl, F. (2024). Challenges of integrated multi-infrastructure asset management: A review of pavement, sewer, and water distribution networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 20(4), 546-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2119480

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Halling, A., & Bækgaard, M. (2024). Administrative burden in citizen-state interactions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad023

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: Can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum. (2010). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 20/PRT/M/2010 tentang pedoman pemanfaatan dan penggunaan bagian-bagian jalan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/160057/permen-pupr-no-20prtm2010-tahun-2010

Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., & Zink, D. (2024). How policy growth affects policy implementation: Bureaucratic overload and policy triage. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(2), 324-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2158208

Kopackova, H., & Libalova, P. (2019). Quality of citizen reporting tools at municipal level. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 4(3), em0092. https://doi.org/10.29333/jisem/5891

Lai, Y., Wang, Y., Cheng, J., Chen, X., & Liu, Q. (2023). Review of constraints and critical success factors of developing urban underground space. Underground Space, 12, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2023.03.001

León-Moreta, A., Fayemiro, O., & Esquivel, A. (2025). Cities’ investment in road infrastructure systems across regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 12(1), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2025.2464669

Makana, L., Metje, N., Jefferson, I., Sackey, M., & Rogers, C. D. F. (2020). Cost estimation of utility strikes: Towards proactive management of street works. Infrastructure Asset Management, 7(2), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.17.00033

Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242

May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453-476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030

Muthalif, M. Z. A., Shojaei, D., & Khoshelham, K. (2022). A review of augmented reality visualization methods for subsurface utilities. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 51, 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101498

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2015). Peraturan Wali Kota Surabaya Nomor 49 Tahun 2015 tentang tata cara penyelenggaraan jaringan utilitas. https://jdih.surabaya.go.id/peraturan/1282

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2016). Peraturan Wali Kota Surabaya Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang perubahan atas Peraturan Wali Kota Surabaya Nomor 49 Tahun 2015. https://jdih.surabaya.go.id/peraturan/2124

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2017). Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang penyelenggaraan jaringan utilitas. https://jdih.surabaya.go.id/peraturan/3355

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2024a). Pemkot Surabaya rampungkan penataan kabel utilitas bawah tanah di Jalan Rajawali. https://surabaya.go.id/id/berita/9476/pemkot-surabaya-rampungkan-penataan-kabel-utilitas-bawah-tanah-di-jalan-rajawali

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2024b). Tata jaringan kabel utilitas di kawasan Kota Lama, Pemkot Surabaya lakukan pemotongan kabel. https://www.surabaya.go.id/id/berita/9491/tata-jaringan-kabel-utilitas-di-kawasan-kota-lama-pemkot-surabaya-lakukan-pemotongan-kabel

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2025). Pemkot Surabaya tertibkan jaringan kabel utilitas tak berizin. https://www.surabaya.go.id/id/berita/23371/pemkot-surabaya-tertibkan-jaringan-kabel-utilitas-tak-berizin

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2026). Kabel FO tanpa izin ditertibkan, Pemkot Surabaya mulai operasi bertahap. https://www.surabaya.go.id/id/berita/24775/kabel-fo-tanpa-izin-ditertibkan-pemkot-surabaya-mulai-operasi-bertahap

Sharafat, A., Khan, M. S., Latif, K., Tanoli, W. A., Park, W., & Seo, J. (2021). BIM-GIS-based integrated framework for underground utility management system for earthwork operations. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5721. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125721

Su, Y., Wang, J., Wang, X., Yao, Y., & Shou, W. (2023). 3D reconstruction in underground utilities. Automation in Construction, 156, 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105100

Sun, S., Xu, C., Wang, A., Yang, Y., & Su, M. (2022). Safety evaluation of urban underground utility tunnel with the grey clustering method based on the whole life cycle theory. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 21(6), 2532-2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.2007104

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Wang, M., & Yin, X. (2022). Construction and maintenance of urban underground infrastructure with digital technologies. Automation in Construction, 141, 104464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104464

Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3-4), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/dak.v13i2.26234

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


##submission.copyrightStatement##

DINAMIKA

Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Universitas Galuh

email: dinamika@unigal.ac.id

ISSN: 2356-2269
eISSN: 2614-2945

Dinamika : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara © 2023 by Program Studi Administrasi Publik, FISIP - Universitas Galuh is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Created by Admin