DINAMIKA AKSES PENGUASAAN TANAH, SISTEM USAHA TANI, DAN PILIHAN KOMODITAS: STUDI KASUS DI KAWASAN HUTAN GUNUNG KALEDONG

M. Gunardi Judawinata

Abstract


This paper, departing from the results of preliminary research conducted since the end of 2020, using a political-ecological perspective will explain the dynamics of farmers to control land in areas that are included in the 'forest area' in Kawa-san Mount Kaledong ( West Java) and the dynamics of changing land use in the area – from tension to 'cooperation'. In addition, this paper will also explain the forms or patterns of farming/production systems that take place due to the development of the value of coffee commodities. The first proposition departs from the argument that the dynamics of access to tenure and land cultivation have consequences on production relations and social organization of production (planting system) where the choice of commodity is a determining factor in these dynamics. The second proposition is that coffee has a high economic value, although it opens up opportunities for farmers to cultivate a number of lands within the 'forest area', leaving farmers involved in farming without the freedom to manage all factors of production. So it can be said that they are not in a position as “independent farmers”, but only as small commodity producers, while the largest economic control lies with non-farmer actors.

Keywords


Akses, Penguasaan lahan, Pilihan komoditas, Usahatani

References


Bachriadi, D. (2020). 24.2 Manifesto Penataan Ulang Penguasaan Tanah Kawasan Hutan. Bandung: ARC BOOK.

Bernstein, H. (2019). Dinamika Kelas Dalam Perubahan Agraria. Yogyakarta: INSIST press.

Borras Jr, S. M. (2009). Agrarian change and peasant studies: changes, continuities and challenges–an introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 5-31.

Creswell , J. W. (2016). Research Design. California: SAGE Publications.

Lorenz, K., & Lal, R. (2018). Agroforestry Systems. The Ohio State University | OSU • Carbon Management and Sequestration Center.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Volume 1. Great Britain: Penguin Books.

Moleong, & Lexy , J. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Putzel , J. (1992). A Captive Land: The Politics of Agrarian Reform in the Philippines. Unit 3 Canonbury Road, 190a New North Road, London N1 7BJ, UK.: the Catholic Institute for International Relations.

Ribot, J., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural Sociology 68(2), 2003, pp. 153–181, 153–181.

Satari , G., Tati, N., Mihardja, O. A., Irwan, A. W., & Wahyudin, A. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Agronomi. Jatinangor: Pustaka Gratuna.

Setiawan, I. (2012). Agribisnis Kreatif: Pilar Wirausaha Masa Depan, Kekuatan Dunia Baru Menuju Kemakmuran Hijau . Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

Tridakusumah, A. C. (2019). Rejurjensi Tunakisma: Pelanggengan Proses Eksklusi dan Rekonstrasi . Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Tuma, E. H. (1965). Twenty-Six Centuries of Agrarian Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/ma.v8i2.7611

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Diterbitkan Oleh :

Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Galuh

Jl. RE Martadinata No. 150 Ciamis 46274

Telepon: 0265-7602739

Email: mimbaragribisnis@gmail.com

 

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

 __________________________________________________________________________________

Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis diindeks oleh: