PERCEPTIONS OF THE NON-ENGLISH DEPARTMENT LECTURERS TOWARDS CLIL IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Fitri Budi Suryani

Abstract


Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is an approach to learning activity that uses foreign language as a medium for learning content so that the competence on the language and the subject area content can be achieved simultaneously. CLIL can be implemented in elementary level, secondary level, as well as tertiary or higher education level. In higher education, CLIL might have two significant reasons to be implemented: the globalized world and university internationalization. So far in Indonesia, nearly all universities have not implemented CLIL yet. This study aims at finding out the lecturers’ perceptions towards CLIL in higher education. The participants of the study were thirty-three lecturers from non-English departments of Universitas Muria Kudus. The intrument to collect the data was closed-ended questionnaire. The result reveals that the non-English department lecturers quite disagree for CLIL to be implemented in higher education. Their objection for having English as a medium of instruction seems to lie in their own ability of English as well as their students’ poor English proficiency.

 Keywords: CLIL, higher education, non-English department lecturers


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhatia, Tej K and William C. Ritchie. (2013). The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism. West Sussex: Blackwell.

Cook, Vivian J. (2002). Portraits of the L2 user. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Coyle, Do, Bernadette Holmes, and Lid King. (2009). Towards an integrated curriculum-CLIL national statement and guidelines. The Languages Company.

Edwards, John. (2013). Bilingualism and multilingualism: Some central concepts. In Tej K Bhatia and William C. Ritchie (Eds). The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism. West Sussex: Blackwell.

Ioannou-Georgiou, Sophie and Pavlos Pavlou. (2011). Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education. Retrieved April 5th 2014 from www.schools.ac.cy/klimakio/Themata/Anglika/teaching/clil/guidelinesforclilimplementation1.pdf.

Hakuta, Kenji. (1986). Cognitive development of bilingual children. Retrieved April 5th 2014 from www.stanford.edu/-hakuta/Publications/(1986).

Kilickaya, Ferit. (2000). Instructors’ attitudes towards English-medium instruction in Turkey. Retrieved April 5th 2014 from www.hltmag.co.uk/nov06/mart01.htm.

Thomas, W.P. and V.P. Collier. (1998). Two languages are better than one. Educational Leadership, 55 (4), 23-26.

Van de Craen, Pit et al. (2007). Why and how CLIL works: An outline for a CLIL theory. Vienna English Working Papers, 6(3), 70-78.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v1i2.2022

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JALL has been indexed and abstracted in: