A TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS’ FINAL DRAFT OF CRITICAL RESPONSES PARAGRAPH TO LITERATURE

Nia Siti Hadiyati, Iskhak Said, Bambang Ruby Sugiarto

Abstract


This study aims at investigating the realization of transitivity particularly process, participant and circumstance types realized in male and female students’ final draft of critical response paragraph to literature. A descriptive qualitative method was employed in analyzing and interpreting the whole data. Furthermore, eight students’ final draft of critical response paragraph to literature which were categorized into male and female students’ critical response paragraph. The findings showed that (1) most of the male and female students were able to realize the transitivity in which the transitivity was realized through the clauses that construct meaning of every single text. (2) Most dominant process realized in eight texts were material process, while actor and goal became the most dominant participants realized and circumstance of location became the most dominant circumstance realized in every single text. However, male students were tend to use the material process in their texts. This study concludes that even though the text were categorized into male and female students’ text, most of the text had realized correctly transitivity while both male and female students’ final draft of critical response paragraph to literature, material process dominantly emerged in the text. Finally, this study suggests English teachers and lecturers to refer the transitivity as a method which can be applied to check whether the students had correctly written critical response or not.

 

Keywords: transitivity, critical response, literature

References


Butt, D., R. Fahey, S. Feez, S. Spinks, C. Yallop. (2006) Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide, (2nd Edition), Sydney: Macquarie University.

Cresswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research : Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research 4th Ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Davi, R. (2017). The role of reader in reader response theory. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies (IJELR), 4(3), 417-422.

Eggins, Suzanne (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London : Pinter Publisher.

Eggins, S. (2004) An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd Edition), London, New York: Continuum.

Ezzina, R. (2015). Transitivity analysis of “The crying lot of 49” by Thomas Pynchon, International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(3), 283-292

Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N., E. (1932). How to design and evaluate research in education, New York : McGraw-Hill.

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N. E., and Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education 8th Ed. New York : McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

Gallardo, B.C. (2006). Analysis of a Literary Work Using Systemic Functional Grammar. International Systemic Functional Congress, 33, 735-762.

Halliday, M. A. (1976). The form of a functional grammar, in Kress, G. (ed.):7-25.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Mattheissen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4th Ed). London : Hodder Arnold.

Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff. (2003). The handbook of language and gender. Malden, MA : Blackwell.

Iskhak. (2015). The application of reader-response theory in enhancing student teachers’ affective and linguistic growth: A classroom action research in EFL teacher education in Indonesia, The Application of Reader-response Theory. 45 (2), 43-55.

Klarer, M. (2004). An introduction to literary study (2nd edition). London : Routledge.

.

Patton , M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation method (3rd Ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Thompson, G. (2004) Introducting functional grammar (2nd Edition), London: Hodder Education.

Wellek, Rene & Austin Waren. (1963). Theory of literature. New York : Harcout, Brace and Company.

Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s first television debate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 6, 65-72.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v2i2.2195

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JALL has been indexed and abstracted in: