Students' Perception on the Use of Grammarly in Writing English Journal

Intan Putri Permata Suci

Abstract


Students find writing difficult, particularly when it comes to writing for scientific journals in English. In writing, we must present writing that is interesting, written correctly, systematic, and useful for readers. With technological developments, a tool called Grammarly created to help make writing easier with many uses. The aim of this study is to investigate students perceive the use of Grammarly correcting and revising English written work that takes the style of scientific journals. This research is used a mixed method and the instructions used are questionnaires and interviews. This questionnaire was distributed to 23 postgraduate English language education students at University of Bengkulu and interviews were conducted with 5 representatives to obtain detailed information. The results showed that 79.7% in the Agree category showed that students were helped in using Grammarly in write journals. However, Grammarly has disadvantages, such as not being able to detect the tense used, checking which is not clear, and limited check space for free features. Therefore, in order to use it premium and access a number of additional beneficial features, we must spend a set amount of money.  So, it can be concluded that Grammarly useful and helpful in writing English journals, but is only able to check at a basic level and at more levels does not support proofreading.

Keywords


Literacy in Language and Culture Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailey, D., & Andrea, R.L. (2020). An Exploratory Study of Grammarly in the Language Learning Context: An Analysis of Test-Based, Textbook-Based and Facebook Corpora. TESOL International Journal, 15(2).

Cheung, K.K.C., & Kevin, W.H.T. (2023). The use of Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Interview Data Analysis in Science Education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(3), 1155–1175.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourth Indian edition). PHI Learning Private Limited.

Dewi, U. (2023). Grammarly as Automated Writing Evaluation: Its Effectiveness from EFL Students’ Perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315

Dizon, G., & John. M.G. (2021). Examining the Impact of Grammarly on the Quality of Mobile L2 Writing. The JALT CALL, 17(2), 74–92.

Fitria, N.A. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Grammarly in Undergraduate Thesis Writing at IAIN Palangka Raya. (Skripsi Sarjana, IAIN Palangka Raya).

Fitria, T.N. (2021). Grammarly as Al-powered English Writing Assistant: Students' Alternative for English Writing. English Language Literature and Teaching Journal, 5(1), 65-78.

Fitriana, K., & Laeli, N. (2022). Exploring English Department Students’ Perceptions on Using Grammarly to Check the Grammar in their Writing. Journal of English Teaching, 8(1), 15-25.

Javler, D.R. (2022). App Review Using Tech Tools for Academic Writing: Grammarly as a Pedagogical Tool. MEXTESOL Journal, 46 (2).

Khairina, N. et al. (2020). Academic Writing: Optimalisasi Mendeley, Grammarly dan Google Translate dalam Pengabdian Webinar Series IKAPASTI-USU. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2).

Lazic, D. et al. (2020). Student Preferences: Using Grammarly to Help EFL Writers with Paraphrasing, Summarizing, and Synthesizing. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.48.9782490057818

Marliyanda, A. et al. (2022). Analisis Survei Terhadap Pengguna Grammarly. Journal Education, 8(3), 1147-1152.

Miranty, D., & Utami, W. (2021). Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) in Higher Education: Indonesian EFL Students’ Perceptions about Grammarly Use across Student Cohorts. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(4),126-137.

Ni’ma, H.N.A. et al. (2020). Reflective Journals as Self-Assessment to Promote Students’ Writing Skill. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(1), 48-58.

Oktaviani, H.I. (2021). Persepsi Mahasiswa dalam Pemilihan Media dan Metode Pembelajaran Online di Perguruan Tinggi. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pembelajaran), 8(2), 167-177.

Oktaviani, S. et al. (2022). Students’ Perception Towards the Use of Grammarly in English Writing Skill of Fourth Semester English Education Department at UINSI Samarinda in the Academic Year 2021/2022. Sultan Idris Pendidikan Profesi Guru Journal.

Sharma, H. (2022). How Short or Long Should be a Questionnaire for any Research? Researchers Dilemma in Deciding the Appropriate Questionnaire Length. Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, 6(1).

Suharto, A.W.B. (2022). Equipping Undergraduate Students with Creative Writing to Improve the Quality of Journal Article Writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 165-180.

Thi, N.K., & Marianne, N. (2022). How Teacher and Grammarly Feedback Complement One Another in Myanmar EFL Students’ Writing. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 31(6), 767–779.

Turner, D.P. (2020). Sampling Methods in Research Design. TESL Canada Journal, 60(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13707

Utami, I.G.A.L.P., & I Gusti, N.A.W.M. (2023). Grammarly and Grammatical Errors Reduction: A Case for Non-Native English Teachers’ Professional Learning. International Journal of Language Education, 7(2), 227-240.

Zaluchu, S.E. (2021). Metode Penelitian di dalam Manuskrip Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan. Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup, 3(2), 249-266.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v8i2.12924

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.