THE USE OF ORAL PEER FEEDBACK TO MINIMIZE THE STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN PRONOUNCING ENGLISH CONSONANT SOUNDS /p/, /f/ and /v/ IN READING ALOUD

Kinanty Kintamani, Asep Dudi Kurnia, Didih Faridah

Abstract


ABSTRACT

 

This study reports on the use of oral peer feedback to minimize the students’ errors in pronouncing English consonant sounds /p/, /f/ and /v/. It was a  case at the twelfth grade in one of senior high schools in Tasikmalaya. Furthermore, this study was aimed to find out the extent to which the students make errors in pronouncing English consonant sounds /p/, /f/ and /v/, how the teacher minimizes the students’ errors in pronouncing English consonant sounds /p/, /f/ and /v/ by means of oral peer feedback and the teacher’s reasons of using oral peer feedback to minimize the errors in pronouncing English consonant sounds /p/, /f/ and /v/. Furthermore, in conducting this study the writer used qualitative research in which case study. To collect the data from participants in this research, there was six students at the twelfth grade and an English teacher who taught English pronunciation in reading activities. Classroom observation and interview were the instruments used by the writer in collecting the data. Based on the research findings, the writer concluded three major conclusions. First, the writer concluded that the majority of the students were able to pronounce the English consonant sounds /p/, /f/ and /v/ correctly that have been proven by the results of students’ pronunciation. Second, the teacher taught the students about reading comprehension that contained the sounds of /p/, /f/ and /v/ with the use of oral peer feedback. In short, it could be seen that teacher’s ways in minimizing students’ errors in pronouncing English consonant sounds /p/, /f/ and /v/ by means of oral peer feedback was succesfully completed by the teacher through the activities in classroom observation. In addition, teacher's ways in implementing oral peer feedback was relevant with the theory from Brookhart (2008, p. 70) about the procedure in implementing oral peer feedback. Finally, teacher’s reasons of using oral peer feedback to minimize the errors in pronouncing English consonant sounds /p/, /f/ and /v/. The writer concluded that the teacher has the main reason for choosing oral peer feedback as one of the ways to minimize students’ error in pronouncing /p/, /f/ and /v/. The teacher argued that the use of oral peer feedback was one of the ways for minimizing students’ errors because the students were demanded to give corrections toward students' errors in pronouncing the words. The students were more felt comfort when they assessed by their friends. Therefore, they will enhance their skill by the corrections given by the other students in oral peer feedback. Moreover, the writer suggests that the further researchers to investigate the cause of students’ error of EFL learner specifically.

 Key words :oral peer feedback, students’ error, English consonant sounds.


Full Text:

PDF (page 18 - 30)

References


Anderson, J. (2006). Positioning place : polylogic approaches to research methodology. Qualitative research journal , 10, 5

Berg, et al. (2006). Designing student peer assessment in higher education: analysis of written and oral peer feedback. Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Teaching in Higher Education Vol. 11, No. 2, April 2006, pp. 135/147.

Bernaus, M., Masgoret, A., Gardner, R., & Reyes, E. (2004). Motivation and attitudes towards learning language in multicultural classrooms. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(2), 75-89.

Brookhart, S. (2008). How to Giveto Your Students Effective Feedback. Printed in the United States of America. Cover art copyright by ASCD

Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. America. Fifth Edition. Pearson Education.Inc..

Chin, Grace, Paul.(2009). An Investigation into Effectiveness of Peer Feedback. China. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages Fortune Institute of Technology, June, 2009 Volume 3

Cohen L., et al. (2007). Research Methods in Education. published in the USA and Canada.

Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 4th Edition. United States of America: Pearson.

Crystal, D. (2003). A dictionary of linguistics and phonet¬ics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intel¬ligibility and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1-16.

Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam pengajaran bahasa Inggris :Petunjuk untuk guru. Bandung : Rizqi Press.

Erdoğan, V. (2005). Contribution of Error Analysis to Foreign Language Teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 1/2. Page 261-270. Available at http://efd.mersin.edu.tr/dergi/meuefd_2005_001_002 /pdf/meuefd_2005_001_002_0261-0270_erdogan.pdf.

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5 (1) : 1-4

Fachun, Z. & Yin, P(2009). A Study of Pronunciation Problems of English Learners in China. Asian Social Science. 5/6. Page 141-14.

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., Hyun, H.H. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Edition. New York: The McGraw Hill Company.

Gilakjani, P & Ahmadi. (2012). The Significance of Pronunciation in English Language Teaching. Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad Universify, Lahijan, Iran. Vol. 5, No. 4; April 20Í2.

Grabe, W & Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing An Applied Linguistics Perspective. Longman, New York.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. Pearson Education Limited : England.

Hassan, I. (2014).Pronunciation Problems: A Case Study of English Language Students at Sudan University of Science and Technology. Sudan. English Language and Literature Studies; Vol. 4, No. 4; 2014 ISSN 1925-4768 E-ISSN 1925-4776 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education.

Hasyim, S. (2002).Error Analysis in the Teaching of English. EFL Journal, Volume 4, No. 1, June 2002: 42 – 50. Indonesia.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Florence, US: Routledge.

Hatano, M. A. (1988). The effects of reading aloud in promoting literacy and enhancing desire to read. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kean College, New Jersey. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED367970)

Ilker, S, Musa, iAlkassim.(2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

Irons, A. (2007).Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback. London : Routledge.

Jabeen, A, Bahram, Mustafai, &Shahbaz.(2015). The Role of Error Analysis in Teaching and Learning of Second and Foreign Language.Education and Linguistics Research ISSN 2377-1356 2015, Vol. 1, No. 2.Iran.http://elr.macrothink.org.

Johansson, R. (2003). Case Study methodology. Nordic journal of architertural research, 13, no. 2 13-19

Kelly, G. (2000). How to Teach Pronounciation :second impression. Bluestone Press.Charlbury, oxfordhire, UK.

Kenworthy, J. (1988). Teaching English Pronunciation. Published in the United State America : Longman Inc.

Kim, S. M. & Lee, C. H. (2015).A case study on online peer feedback for learning English pronunciation at university level. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 18(4),42–69. Retrieved from http://journal.kamall.or.kr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/

Kreidler, C. (2004). The Pronunciation of English. Second edition. United Kingdom. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The geological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Lin, W. (2009). Exploring students’ perception of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English teaching practice and critique. July, 2009, Vol. 1 number 2

Liu, N-F. & Carless, D. (2006) Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), pp.279-290

Marinova-Todd, S. H., Marshall, D. B., & Snow, C. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 9-34.

Masgoret, A., & Gardner, R. (2003). Attitudes, motiva¬tion, and second language learning: A meta-analy¬sis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53(Suppl. 2), 167-210.

Mathew, I. (2005). Errors in Pronunciation of Consonants By Learners of English as A Foreign Language Whose First Languages are Indonesian, Gayo And Acehnese. Monash University Linguistics Papers Volume Three, Number Two.

Mendonça, C and K.E. Johnson. (1994). Peer review negotiations : review activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quartetly, 28/4:745-69

Na'ama, A. (2011).An Analysis of Errors Made By Yemeni University Students in The English Consonant- Clusters System. Damascus University Journal, Vol.27 No.3+4.

Odgen, R. (2009). An introduction to English Phonetics. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.

Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course 4th Edition. United Kingdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rodicio, F. (2014).Aloud reading and silent reading. Which form of reading in the classroom results in better comprehension?. Proceedings of INTED2014 Conference 10th-12th March 2014, Valencia, Spain

Shan-ling, L. (2012). The Application of Error Analysis in College English Teaching. China. Sino-US English Teaching, ISSN 1539-8072 May 2012, Vol. 9, No. 5, 1124-1131. University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai,.

Saputra, I. (2011). The Ability Of Second Semester Students Of English Education Department In Pronouncing Consonant Sounds Focusing On /F/ And /V/ Of STIKIP PGRI Banjarmasin Academy Year 2010/2011.

Saville, Muriel – Troike. (2006). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. New York. Published in the United States of America: Cambridge University Press.

Schaetzel, K & Low, E. L. (2009). Teaching Pronunciation to Adult English Language Learners. Center For Applied Linguistics. Washington, DC 20016-1859.

Widodo, H. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide for Undergraduate Students Discipline of Linguistics. University of Adelaide.

Wiserman, A. (2011). Interactive read alouds: Teachers and students constructing knowledge and literacy together. Reading Teacher, 38(6), 431-438.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v3i1.2620

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  

Indexed in Google Scholar, ResearchGate