THE STUDENTS' LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT AFTER AND WITHOUT STUDYING ENGLISH IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Gusri Emiyati Ali

Abstract


The Critical Period Hypothesis by Lenneberg (1976)  states that ages 2 to 12 are ideal ages for achieving foreign language skills such as a native speaker. Based on this hypothesis, the perfect time for children to learn English as a foreign language is in elementary school. Meanwhile, Indonesian government policy through the 2013 curriculum does not require children in primary schools to learn English. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the English learning achievement of students between those who studied and those who did not study English in elementary school. This research is important to be conducted since it can be a reference for the Indonesian government in developing English language teaching and learning policy in elementary schools.  The sample of this research consisted of two groups selected through a purposive sampling technique. They were the groupS of students who studied and who did not study English in elementary school. Data were grouped, presented, and then compared. The results showed that students who studied English in elementary school had better English learning achievement than students who did not study English in elementary school. It is recommended for further related researches to consider many factors those can be influencing the students' English learning achievements such as the English teaching and learning method used by the educators in high school and university, attitudinal factor, and the learning environment. 

Keywords


Critical Period Hypothesis, English in elementary school

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aan, Komariah dan Djam’an Satori. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Bandung : Alfabeta.

Agung, Iskandar. 2010. Meningkatkan Kreativitas Pembelajaran bagi Guru. Jakarta.

Akdon dan Ridwan. 2013. Rumus dan Data dalam Analisis Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta

Ali, M. 2010. Metodologi dan Aplikasi Riset Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Cendikia Utama.

Alwi, Hasan. 2007. KBBI, edisi ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

A.M, Sardiman. 2000. Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali. Pers.

Azwar, S. 2012. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Brown, H. G. 2001. Teaching by Principles: Interactive Approach to Language. Pedagogy. New York : San Francisco State University

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2011. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Djalal, M.F. 2006. Penilaian Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Asing. Malang: P3T IKIP Malang

Field, John. 2003. Psycholinguistics A Resource Book For Students. Routledge Taylor& Francis Group.

Hamdu, Ghullam. 2011. “Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar IPA Di Sekolah Dasar’. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol. 12 No. 1 ISSN 1412-565Xscolar.google.co.id/scholar?q=jurnal+variasi+mengajar+ dan+prestasi+belajar+siswa+issn&btnG=&hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1 (Diakses 1 Mei 2017).

Permendikbud No. 67. 2013. Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah.

Santrock, J.W. 2004. Educational Psychology 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Steinberg, Danni. D & Natalia. V. Sciarini. 2006. An Introduction to Psicolinguistics. Pearson Education Limited. Britain.

Sugiyono, 2008. Metode Penelitian Kunatitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo.

Gulo, W. 2002. Strategi Belajar-Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana. Indonesia.

Slavin, robert E. 2009. Cooperative Learning (Teori, Riset, Praktik). Bandung: Nusa Media.

Sukmadinata, N.S. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarya

Troike, Saville. 2006. Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v4i2.3833

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.