Widya Agustina, Lilies Youlia Friatin


This study was aimed at finding out thestudents’ perceptions about the implementation of brain-writing in teaching writing recount text.In order to support the data analysis, the writers used the theory from Sadker and Ellen (2007, p. 6)about the steps in implementing brain writing technique in teaching recount text. Furthermore, in conducting this study the writers used qualitative research in which case study was employed to collect the data from participants in this research that was English teacher who taught recount text through brain-writing technique. Moreover, interview was the instrument used by the writers in collecting the data, then the data analyzed qualitatively. Based on the research findingsthe writersconcluded that the teacher did some steps in implementing brain-writing including. Overall, the steps in implementing brain-writing was relevant with the theory from Sadker, Ellen (2007, p. 6).The second conclusion was about student’s perception in implementing brain-writing technique in teaching writing recount text, the writers concluded that the students viewed the teaching-learning process of recount text through brain-writing technique was enjoy activities that not only improve students’ motivation and students’ achievement.Moreover, the writers suggests that the further researcher to investigate students’ difficulties on the use brain-writing technique in teaching writing

Full Text:



Cooper, J., D. (2002). Current research in reading/language arts: Understanding and supporting comprehension development in the elementary and middle grades. Houghton Mifflin Co.

Dawson, A. (2009). Towards a comprehensive approach to enhancing the performance of health workers in maternal, neonatal and reproductive health at community level: Learning from experiences in the Asia and Pacific regions. Sydney: human Resources for Health Knowledge Hub, University of New South Wales.

Fraenkel, R. J., Wallen, E. N., Hyun, H., H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education.McGraw Hill Press.

Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for?.Boston University.American political science review,(98) 2.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching : Fourth edition. USA : Longman.

Litcanu, D, Prostin, O and Oros, K. (2015). Brain-Writing Vs. Brainstorming Case Study For Power Engineering Education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 1; January 2014

Kennedy, J. (2001). Ethics codes and survey researchers paper presented at the annual meeting of the american association for public opinion research. Montreal, May 2001. Available at (accessed 21.4.12).

Nunan, David. 2004. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Contemporary.

Oviansha, D. (2009).Teaching Writing by Combining Brain Writing Strategy and QuickWrite Strategy For Senior High School Students. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(4), 167-198

Rodruiguez . (2008). Brainstorming and Brainwriting as creativity techniques: a diagnosisin companies of the metallurgic sector. Tesol Quarterly, 16(2), 195-209.

Ruane, J. M. (2005). Essentials of research methods: A guide to social science research. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Russel, D.(2000). Learning based on the process of enquiry imaginative curriculum working paper.Artsand Humanities in Higher Education, 1 (1) 73-83.

Sadker, D M and Ellen S. .(2007). Gender in the classroom, foundations, skills, methods, Strategies, Across The curriculum. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Sejnost, Roberta L .(2009). Tools for Teaching in the Block. New York: Corwin.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License