The Implementation of Project-Based Learning in Teaching Recount Writing: Students’ Perceptions and Writing Performance at a Rural State Junior High School in Banjarsari

Vivi Putriyantina, Juhana Juhana, Widya Rizky Pratiwi

Abstract


Writing instruction in rural English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms requires approaches that connect genre knowledge, authentic communication, and instructional support. This study examined the implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in teaching recount writing, students’ perceptions of the learning process, and changes in their writing performance. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design involved 32 Grade VIII students, one English teacher, and nine student interviewees representing high-, middle-, and low-achievement groups. Writing tests and a perception questionnaire provided quantitative evidence of changes in writing performance and students’ perceptions, while classroom observations, learning artifacts, and interviews documented the implementation process and explained the quantitative patterns. PjBL was implemented through project initiation and planning, idea development and initial drafting, revision and product completion, and presentation and reflection. Students reported very positive perceptions (M = 4.31), particularly in the cognitive and collaborative dimensions. Their mean writing score increased from 64.75 to 71.81; the difference was statistically significant, t(31) = −8.432, p < .001, with a large within-group effect (Cohen’s dz = 1.49). Qualitative evidence showed that students’ idea development and organization occurred within a structured instructional process involving explicit genre instruction, teacher scaffolding, peer collaboration, feedback, revision, and diorama-based visual support. In this context, PjBL was feasible and was associated with improved recount writing when implemented as a structured writing process rather than merely as product making.

Keywords


project-based learning, recount writing, rural EFL, students’ perceptions, writing performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahiaku, P. K. A., Uleanya, C., & Muyambi, G. C. (2025). Rural Schools and Tech Use or Sustainability: The Challenge of Disconnection. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 12557–12571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13311-9

Ahmed, F. E. Y., Abdallah, N. M. M., Hamed, S. O. E., & Hamed, F. M. A. (2025). Word Choice Errors in EFL Undergraduates’ Written Language. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.11107

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching 5th Edition (5th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Chandra, S. I. L., Dollah, S., Sakkir, G., & Rosalia, H. (2024). An Analysis of Students’ Problems in Writing Recount Text. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum2609

Culclasure, B. T., Longest, K. C., & Terry, T. M. (2019). Project-Based Learning (Pjbl) in Three Southeastern Public Schools: Academic, Behavioral, and Social-Emotional Outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1842

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & Education. Macmillan.

Echazarra, A., & Radinger, T. (2019). Learning in Rural Schools (OECD Education Working Papers, Vol. 196). https://doi.org/10.1787/8b1a5cb9-en

Gonzalez-Vidal, T. (2024). Navigating Linguacultures Through Fanfiction: Unveiling Opportunities and Challenges in the Chilean EFL School Context. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2366466

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A Review of Project-Based Learning in Higher Education: Student Outcomes and Measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

Hamidah, H., Rabbani, T. A. S., Fauziah, S., Puspita, R. A., Gasalba, R. A., & Nirwansyah. (2020). HOTS Oriented Module : Project-Based Learning. SEAMEO QITEP in Language.

Hsin, C. T., & Wu, H. K. (2023). Implementing a Project-Based Learning Module in Urban and Indigenous Areas to Promote Young Children’s Scientific Practices. Research in Science Education, 53(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10043-z

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, Literacy and L2 Writing Instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005

Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Longman Higher Education.

Kavlu, A. (2017). Implementation of Project Based Learning (PBL) in EFL (English As A Foreign Language) Classrooms in Fezalar Educational Institutions (Iraq). International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i2sip67

Knapp, Peter., & Watkins, Megan. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar : Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. UNSW Press.

Lu, Q. (2021). A New Project-Based Learning in English Writing. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(5), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i05.21271

Muhaimin, Asrial, Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., & Hadisaputra, P. (2020). Science Teachers’ Integration of Digital Resources in Education: A survey in Rural Areas of One Indonesian province. Heliyon, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04631

Nguyen, A. N., & Tuan, V. Van. (2024). Teachers’ and Students’ Viewpoints of Implementing Project-Based Learning in Teaching and Learning Legal English at Higher Education Institutions in Vietnam. Teaching English Language Journal, 18(2), 285–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2024.466163.1653

Raufi, B. S., Mulyono, H., Ilyas, H. P., & Zulaiha, S. (2024). Exploring Indonesian EFL Students’ Lexical Diversity and Its Correlation with Academic Vocabulary Use in an Online Academic Writing Environment. Ampersand, 13, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100196

Siekman, L., Parr, J. M., & Busse, V. (2022). Structure and Coherence as Challenges in Composition: A Study of Assessing Less Proficient EFL Writers’ Text Quality. Assessing Writing, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100672

Syarifah, E. F., & Emiliasari, R. N. (2019). Project-Based Learning to Develop Students’ Ability and Creativity in Writing Narrative Story. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v5i1.1627

Taufiqulloh, Fahdly, F. Z., Rosdiana, I., Ferrer, C. N., Ratsamemonthon, C., Nindya, M. A., & Irawan, N. (2025). Comprehensive Review of Writing Assessments in EFL Contexts: A Meta-Synthetic Study. International Journal of Language Testing, 15(1), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijlt.2024.475218.1367

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & Ellen Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Waly, M. M., & Ashadi, A. (2024). Unleashing the Potentials: Nurturing Students’ 4Cs Skills through Project-Based Learning with ICT in EFL Classrooms. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v9i2.23208

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jwp.v13i2.25804

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Indexing: