Pemetaan Bibliometrik Mengenai Penelitian Warisan Budaya Digital

Yunus Winoto, Najwa Auliana Hanifatunnisa, Ute Lies Siti Khadijah

Abstract

Warisan budaya digital merupakan konsep tentang bagaimana teknologi dapat kita manfaatkan dalam mempertahankan identitas budaya dan sejarah. Penelitian-penelitian mengenai topik tersebut akan bermanfaat untuk pelbagai kepentingan, layaknya pembelajaran dan ilmu pengetahuan, pengambilan keputusan sekaligus membantu perancangan undang-undang yang masih berkaitan dengan warisan digital ataupun preservasi sumber informasi secara umum. Dalam penelitian ini, sumber data diperoleh dari basis data penelitian internasional bernama Scopus. Kata kunci yang dimasukkan pada basis data tersebut adalah “digital heritage” dengan rentang waktu yang dibatasi antara tahun 2014 - 2023. Sementara, untuk perangkat lunak yang digunakan untuk keperluan menganalisis data antara lain Biblioshiny dan VOSviewer. Berdasarkan hasil dan pembahasan, ditemukan bahwa Marc Aurel Schnabel dan Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) menjadi penulis dan sumber dengan performa tertinggi dalam hal menghasilkan publikasi. Diikuti oleh negara-negara seperti United Kingdom, Italy, dan United States. Ditemukan pula frasa-frasa dengan intensitas penggunaan tertinggi, diantaranya “digital heritage”, “cultural heritage”, dan “virtual reality”. Kemudian, selain basis tema yang umum dibahas terdapat tema-tema yang sedang berkembang di kalangan penulis, yaitu photogrammetry, architectural design, image reconstruction, serta artificial intelligence.

Keywords

warisan digital; bibliometrik; biblioshiny; vosviewer.

References

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Australia, N. L. of, & UNESCO. (2003). Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage (CI.2003/WS/3). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000130071

Baker, K. (2013). Information literacy and cultural heritage: a proposed generic model for lifelong learning. In Information Literacy and Cultural Heritage Developing a Model for Lifelong Learning (pp. 117–133). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-720-0.50005-2

Chellappandi, P., & Vijayakumar, C. S. (2018). Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Webometrics / Cybermetrics, Informetrics and Altmetrics - An Emerging Field in Library and Information Science Research. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(1), 1–4. https://www.shanlaxjournals.in/journals/index.php/education/article/view/270

Clini, P., Frontoni, E., Quattrini, R., Pierdicca, R., & Puggioni, M. (2019). Archaeological landscape and heritage. Innovative knowledge-based dissemination and development strategies in the “Distretto Culturale Evoluto Flaminia NextOne.” IL CAPITALE CULTURALE, 19, 211–235. https://riviste.unimc.it/index.php/cap-cult/article/view/1962

Desul, S., Mahapatra, R. K., Patra, R. K., Sethy, M., & Pandey, N. (2023). Semantic technology for cultural heritage: a bibliometric-based review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2023-0125

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Economou, M. (2015). Heritage in the Digital Age. In W. Logan, M. N. Craith, & U. Kockel (Eds.), A Companion to Heritage Studies (pp. 215–228). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118486634

Esfahania, H. J., Tavasolia, K., & Jabbarzadeha, A. (2019). Big data and social media: A scientometrics analysis. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.2.007

Król, K. (2021). Digital cultural heritage of rural tourism facilities in Poland. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 488–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2019-0130

Magadán‑Díaz, M., & Rivas‑García, J. I. (2022). Publishing Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(3), 665–683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09911-3

Sangam, S. L. (2015). Bradford’s Empirical Law. Journal of Library Development, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.32344/jld/v1/i1/2015/1-13

Shah, F. A., & Jawaid, S. A. (2023). The h-Index: An Indicator of Research and Publication Output. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 39(2), 315–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.7398

UNESCO. (n.d.). Concept of Digital Heritage. En.Unesco.Org. Retrieved November 21, 2023, from https://en.unesco.org/themes/information-preservation/digital-heritage/concept-digital-heritage

UNESCO. (2009). Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage (p. 5). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179529

Viju, V. G. W. (2013). Application of Bradford’s Law of Scattering to the Literature of Library & Information Science: A Study of Doctoral Theses Citations Submitted to the Universities of Maharashtra, India. Library Philosophy and Practice, 43. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1054/

Wang, X., Lasaponara, R., Luo, L., Chen, F., Wan, H., Yang, R., & Zhen, J. (2020). Digital Heritage. In H. Guo, A. Annoni, & M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Manual of Digital Earth (1st ed., p. 871). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9915-3

Yu, J., & Muñoz‐Justicia, J. (2020). A Bibliometric Overview of Twitter‐Related Studies Indexed in Web of Science. Future Internet, 12(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fi12050091

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/ja.v11i2.16460

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.