Cultural and Gender Variation in Argumentative Coherence: A Corpus-Based Study of Indonesian and Japanese EFL Learners

Bambang Ruby Sugiarto

Abstract


This study examines how cultural background and gender relate to argumentative coherence in English writing among Indonesian and Japanese EFL learners. Although intercultural rhetoric research has explored cross-cultural variation in argumentative structure, limited corpus-based studies have compared learners at controlled proficiency levels using a structured analytical framework. Drawing on 20 B1_2-level essays from the ICNALE corpus, this study applies the Toulmin Argument Pattern (TAP) framework to analyze the distribution of claims, data, counterclaims, and rebuttals. Argumentative quality was further assessed using an adapted coherence-level scale. The findings reveal clear cross-cultural variation: Indonesian learners produced a higher frequency of claims and supporting data, reflecting a predominantly linear argumentative structure, whereas Japanese learners more frequently incorporated counterclaims and rebuttals, resulting in more structurally complete argumentative cycles. Gender-related differences were observed in the distribution of argumentative elements; however, these patterns should be interpreted cautiously due to the exploratory sample size. Overall, the study highlights the role of culturally shaped rhetorical preferences in EFL argumentative writing and demonstrates the usefulness of TAP as a diagnostic tool for examining intercultural variation in coherence. Pedagogical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords


Argumentative Writing; Cultures and Genders; Text Coherence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Khazraji, A. (2019). Analysis of Discourse Markers in Essays Writing in ESL Classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12235a

Cekiso, M., Tshotsho, B., & Somniso, M. (2016). Exploring First-Year University Students’ Challenges with Coherence Writing Strategies in Essay Writing in a South African University. International Journal of Educational Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890431

Chang, W., Liao, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Improving children’s textual cohesion and writing attitude in a game-based writing environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1–2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1671459

Connor, U. (2009). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Papers in Linguistics, 17(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389208

Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System. 42, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023

Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 694–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694

Hadiyati, N. S., Said, I., & Sugiarto, B.R. (2018). A Transitivity Analysis of Male and Female Students’ Final Draft of Critical Responses Paragraph to Literature. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 2(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v2i2.2195

Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836010

Hart, E. K., & Annear, C. (2020). Research Coherence: A Framework for Successful Student Research. College Teaching, 68(3), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1758022

Ishikawa, S. (2013). The ICNALE and sophisticated contrastive interlanguage analysis of Asian learners of English. Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world, 1, 91-118. https://language.sakura.ne.jp/icnale/

Lee, J. & Lee, J. (2023) Development of Argumentative Writing Ability in EFL Middle School Students, Reading & Writing Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2161438

Kaplan, R.B. (1966), Cultural Thought Patterns in Inter-Cultural Education. Language Learning, 16: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x

Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005

Nagao, A. (2018). A Genre-Based Approach to Writing Instruction in EFL Classroom Contexts. English Language Teaching, 11(5), 130. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n5p130

Nasita, D., Sugiarto, B.R., & Thoyyibah, L. (2020). The Realization of Interpersonal Meaning on Male and Female Students’ Personal Letters. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 4(1), 57-76. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/jall/article/view/3133

Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Khaneh, M. M. M. C., Babayi, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022). Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035

Pena, J. M. B. (2021). On ancient vs. modern, eastern vs. western, contributions to text coherence theory. Language & History, 64(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597536.2021.1888369

Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012

RahmtAllah, E. a. E. (2020). EFL Students’ Coherence Skill in Writing: A Case Study of Third Year Students of Bachelors in English Language. English Language Teaching, 13(8), 120. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n8p120

Salikin, H. (2019). Factors affecting male and female Indonesian EFL students’ writing anxiety. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20229

Sugiarto, B. R., Sofwan, A., & Sutopo, D. (2015). Mood Realization of the Learning Activities in the Grade VII English Textbook Published by the Ministry of Education and Culture. English Education Journal, 5(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/6844

Sugiarto, B. R., & Siregar, B. U. (2023). Lexical Cohesion in English – Indonesia Machine Translation Output: The realization of Manual Post-Editing. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 7(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v7i1.9862

Sugiarto, B. R. (2024). Unlocking Multilingual Potential: Systemic Functional Linguistics Strategies for effective descriptive writing instruction. Sawerigading, 30(2), 328–336.

Sugiarto, B. R., & Manara, C. (2025). Digital multilingual identity: insights from Indonesian multilingual EFL students’ identity construction on Instagram. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2025.2508867

Sugiarto, B.R. (2026). Beyond algorithmic control: decolonizing Sundanese cultural sovereignty on TikTok. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2025.2610501

Brata, Y.R., Sugiarto, B.R., Nurholis, E. Sudarto, S. (2026). Haling ku Aing: A Multimodal Pragmatics Analysis of Sundanese Cultural Values on A Tiktok Video. Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18205713

Sugiarto, B.R., et al. (2025). Sadar Bahasa, Sadar Diri: Revolusi Sunyi dalam Konservasi Budaya. Minhaj Pustaka. https://doi.org/10.71457/668959

Tsemach, E., & Zohar, A. (2021). The intersection of gender and culture in argumentative writing. International Journal of Science Education, 43(6), 969–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1894499

Tshotsho, B. (2014). Assessing students’ academic writing using systemic functional linguistics at a university in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890154

Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005

Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2023). Chatbot-based training on logical fallacy in EFL argumentative writing, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2197417




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v10i1.23462

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.