AN ANALYSIS OF EFL STUDENTS’ TRANSITIVITY PROCESS OF WRITING RECOUNT TEXT

Yanti Rosmayanti

Abstract


This paper focuses on the analysis of transitivity process contained in EFL students‟ writing recount text and dominant type of transitivity process in EFL students‟ writing recount text. Descriptive qualitative method is used to analyze the Transitivity Process of EFL students‟ writing recount text consisting of collecting data, classifying data, analyzing, and interpreting data. The document of this study is six EFL students‟ writing recount texts and there are 173 data consisting of clauses taken from the text. The finding reveals that there are six types of transitivity process contained in EFL students‟ recount text: material process, mental process, relational process, behavioral process, existential process and verbal process. Material process becomes the first mostly applied with the total number of occurrence 108 (62.43%) from overall data. Mental process becomes the second mostly applied with the total number of occurrence 26 (15.03%) from overall data. Relational process becomes the third mostly applied with the total number of occurrence 21 (12.14%) from overall data. Existential process is applied with the total number of occurrence 12 (6.94%) from overall data. Verbal Process is applied with the total number of occurrence 5 (2.88%) from all data; and the last, behavioral process is applied with the total number of occurrence 1 (0.58%) from overall data. Material Process is the dominant transitivity process types in all the EFL students‟ recount text with the total number of occurrence 108. Based on the findings, it is recommended that, Transitivity process should be applied in the educational field, for example, in the learning writing process, to help students in improving their achievement and their knowledge of in transitivity process. Keywords:  Recount text, Transitivity process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boardman, C.(2008). Writing to communicate. California/America: Pearson Logman.

Bloor, T., and Bloor, M. (2004). The functional analysis of English. London:Arnold.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Sixth

Edition. New York:Routledge..

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational study: Planing, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative study. Boston: Pearson Education.

Eggins, Suzanne. (2004). an Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Australia: GerdStabler.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar: An introductory workbook. New South Wales: GerdStabler.

Halliday, M. A. K. &Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to, functional grammar,(4th ed). London: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing, London: The University of Michigan Press.

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 2 [Special Issue – January 2014]

Helping EFL Students Improve their Writing

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 2 [Special Issue – January 2014]

Helping EFL Students Improve their Writing

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 2 [Special Issue – January 2014]

Helping EFL Students Improve their Writing

Muslim, I. M. (2014). Helping EFL students improve their writing. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(2), 105-112.

Saragih N S & Pardede H. 2014. The effectiveness of using recount text to

improve writing skill for grade iii students of Kalam Kudus Elementary School

Pematangsiantar. IOSR Journal: Vol 19. PP 56-64.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v8i1.5232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

JEEP has been indexed in