An Analysis of Male and Female Students’ critical Thinking in Debate Classroom Interaction (A Descriptive Study at One of the Private Universities in Ciamis)

Rika Rahmawati, Etika Rachmawati, Didih Faridah

Abstract


This study deals with an analysis of male and female students’ critical thinking in debate classroom interaction. This study aimed to find out the debate impact on male and female students’ critical thinking and identify which gender tends to have more critical thinking. This study applied a descriptive qualitative research design with document analysis. The data material consists of students’ comments on google classroom with 27 participants in two classes which are 12 male students and 15 female students. The data was analyzed using a critical thinking rubric by identified and converted into a percentage. The result shows that debate has an impact on students’ critical thinking. Both male students and female students already can give a logical statement. The students’ critical thinking has an impact at a high level. The result also indicates that male students’ scores on critical thinking were lower than female students’ scores. Male and female has a different percentage where the male has 159 scores (40%) while the female has 236 scores (60%). At last, the researcher provides some suggestions for the teacher who guides this activity should give the students more variations in building interaction and make the students feel comfortable in joining the online classroom. The researcher expects the next researcher who is interested in the analysis of critical thinking and classroom interaction to conduct another research in the online classroom.

Keywords


critical thinking; debate; classroom interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arisandi, B. (2018). Classroom Interaction Pattern in the EFL Task-Based Classroom. 3(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.22236/JER

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Testing Book: Principles and Classroom Practice. Book, 314.

Bowen, G. (2017). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. October, 15. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research (Fourth). PEARSON.

Frankel, K. L., & Dolan, J. F. (2007). Characterizing arid region alluvial fan surface roughness with airborne laser swath mapping digital topographic data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 112(F2).

Frankel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). Single-subject research. How to design and evaluate research in education, 298-311.

Handayani, R. (2002). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in a Classroom Debate. 19(2), 132–140.

Iman, J. N. (2017). Debate Instruction in EFL Classroom : Impacts on the Critical Thinking and Speaking Skill. 10(4), 87–108.

Jack R. Fraenkel, J.R., Norman E. Wallen, N.E., & Hyun. H. H. (2012). How Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Mc Graw Hill.

Mahanal, S. (2012). Strategi pembelajaran biologi, gender dan pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. In Prosiding Seminar Biologi (Vol. 9, No. 1).

Merchant, K. (2012). How men and women differ: Gender differences in communication styles, influence tactics, and leadership styles.

Nurjannah, N., Setiawan, A., Rusdiana, D., & Muslim, M. (2019, February). Students’ critical thinking skills toward analyzing argumentation on heat conductivity concept. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 3, p. 032053). IOP Publishing.

Pratiwi, A. N. (2014). Improving the speaking skills through the use of cooperative language learning for the seventh grade students of smpn 4 Yogyakarta in the academic year of 2013/2014 (Doctoral dissertation, YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY).

Ricketts, J. C., & Rudd, R. (2004). The relationship between critical thinking dispositions and critical thinking skills of selected youth leaders in the national FFA organization. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 54(1), 21-33.

Sari, M. S., Syarif, H., & Mukhaiyar, M. (2019). Students ’ Perception of Critical Thinking in Constructing English Argumentative Writing. 8(7), 2018–2020.

Walker, A., & Kettler, T. (2020). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in High Ability Adolescents : Effects of a Debate and Argument Analysis Curriculum. 10(1), 21–39.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v10i2.11688

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

JEEP has been indexed in