A GENDER-BASED ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES IN READING ENGLISH

Dedeh rosidah

Abstract


This study is intended to find out the students’ metacognitive reading strategies that were used by male and female students when they were reading English and to find out whether male and female students have typical differences in using their metacognitive strategies. Metacognitive is the way to monitor or regulate cognitive strategies, which include solve a problem, planning for learning, and evaluation after reading activity. This study was conducted by involving fifty one participants that consist of thirty two females and nineteen males at  the eighth grade of a junior high school in Ciamis who completed the questionnaire (Mokhtari & Reichard, 2002). The results showed that males use five strategies and females use fourteen strategies in high frequency. The male students prefer to use problem-solving reading strategies, followed by global reading strategies and support reading strategies. The female students prefer to use problem-solving reading strategies, followed by support reading strategies and global reading strategies. Accordingly, females show higher users of reading strategies than males in each of three sub-categories with the typical differences in overall sub-caregories. From the analysis of the data, it could be concluded that female students’ metacognitive reading strategies of the junior high school in Ciamis was higher than male students. The result of this research can be used as a reference for the further research about the analysis of gender differences to students’ metacognitive reading strategies in reading English. In addition, the other researchers can conduct the study either to compare or follow up this study.Keywords: gender differences, metacognitive, reading strategies.

References


Brown, J. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.

Dawaideh, A. & Saadi, I. (2013). Assessing metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use for students from the faculty of education at the university of king abdulaziz. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(4), 223-235. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.71.3.4

Holmes, J., & Meyerhoof, M. (2003). The handbook of language and gender. United Kingdom : Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Li, Fenfang. (2010). A study of english reading strategies used by senior middle school students. Asian Social Science, 6(10), 184-192. School of Foreign Languages, Chongqing Yangtze Normal University, China. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/ass

Ling, S. (2011). Investigating chinese english majors’ use of reading strategies. A study on the relationship between reading strategies and reading achievements

Mills, M. (2011). The how and why of sex differences. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-how-and-why-sex-differences/ 201110/sex-difference-vs-gender-difference-oh-im-so-confused

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 94(2), 249-259. Retrieved from http://209.129.155.125/learningconnection/ctl/FIGs/ jumpstart/MARSIpacket.pdf

Poole, Alex. (2009). The reading strategies used by male and female colombian university students. Western Kentucky University, USA. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/.../11007

Richardson, J., Caplan, P., Crawford, M., & Hyde, J. (1997). Gender differences in human cognition. New York : Oxford University Press.

Stake, Robert E. (2010). Qualitative research : studying how things work. New York, London : The Guilford Press.

The Education Alliance. (2007). Gender differences in reading achievement : policy implications and best prectices. Retrieved from http://www.educationalliance.org




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v1i1.1832

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

JEEP has been indexed in