FLANDERS INTERACTION ANALYSIS (FIA) IN ANALYZING TEACHER-STUDENT INTERACTION IN EFL CLASSROOM BASED ON 2013 CURRICULUM

Retna Fauziah Adhitya Rini

Abstract


This study investigated teacher-students interaction in EFL classroom that implements 2013 curriculum. This study focused on the kind as well as the characteristic of teacher-students interaction in EFL classroom that implements 2013 curriculum. In analyzing the data, this study was analyzed by means of Flanders Interaction Analysis. Flanders Interaction Analysis is a system that aims to measure the classroom interaction which has 10 categories, namely accepting feeling, praising and encouraging, accepting or using ideas of student, asking questions, lecturing, giving directions, criticizing or justifying authority, student-talk response, student-talk initiation and silence (Walsh, 2011). In this regard, two questions are addressed : 1) What kinds of teacher-students interaction occurred in EFL classroom that implements 2013 curriculum based on Flanders Interaction Analysis? and 2) What is characteristic of teacher-students interaction reflected in EFL classroom that implements 2013 curriculum based on Flanders Interaction Analysis?. To obtain the data, classroom observations were conducted in two English classes of Peminatan (Optional) program at the tenth grade in one of Senior High School in Ciamis which implements 2013 curriculum. Then, two English teachers and sixty students were selected purposively. The findings revealed that the kinds of teacher-students interaction occurred in both classes were dominated by teacher talk through emphasizing on asking question. In the case of teacher A, from the total of teacher talk (72.29%), teacher A used asking question (27.56%). While in the case of teacher B, from the total of teacher talk (64.93%), teacher B used asking question (25.97%). In terms of characteristic of teacher-students interaction, the characteristic in both classes was content-cross. In the case of teacher A, the percentage of content-cross was 43.83%, while the percentage of content-cross of teacher B was 38.34%. From the findings above, it could be inferred both teachers used asking questions and lecturing to interact with the students. In line with the implementation of 2013 curriculum, both teachers have not been comprehended the implementation of 2013 curriculum due to the dominance of teacher talk in teacher-student interaction during teaching and learning process.

References


Asmara, T.R. (2007). An analysis on the speaking classroom interaction at the tenth grade of sma negeri 7 surakarta in the academic year 2006/2007. Tesis Magister. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles:An interactive approach in language pedagogy 2nd edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Goronga, P. (2013). The nature and quality of classroom verbal interaction. Savap Journal, 4(2), pp. 431-444.

Hall, G. (2011). Exploring english language teaching :language in action. New York : Routledge

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Permendikbud no. 69/2013: Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum SMA/MA. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Nurmasitah, S. (2010). A study of classroom interaction in a geography class conducted in English. Tesis Magister. Universitas Diponegoro.

Shahi, R.S. (2010). Observation and analysis of classroom teaching at tertiary level. Bilingual Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 1(1), pp. 1-4.

Tuan, L.T., & Nhu, N.T.K. (2010). Theoretical review on oral interaction in EFL classrooms. Studies in language and literature, 1(4), pp. 29-48.

Ur, P. (2000). A course in language teaching practice and theory. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse language in action. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Widiyatmoko, A., & Nurmasitah, S. (2013). A study of classroom interaction in Microteaching class conducting in English : The case at the fifth year of science education study program of Semarang state university. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS), 1(3), pp. 188-192.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v1i1.1834

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

JEEP has been indexed in