Exploring a lecturer’s reader-response strategy to foster university students’ critical thinking

Adila Yohana, Lilies Youlia Friatin, Luthfiyatun Thoyyibah

Abstract

Critical thinking is a vital 21st-century skill, yet many Indonesian students struggle to develop higher-order thinking abilities. This study investigates the use of the reader-response strategy to stimulate university students’ critical thinking, particularly in areas such as interpretation, analysis, and evaluation. The study aims to examine how the lecturer implements the strategy, identify the challenges faced, and explore students’ perceptions of its effectiveness. A qualitative case study design was employed. Data were gathered through non-participant observation, a semi-structured interview with a lecturer, and a questionnaire distributed to 24 students enrolled in an Introduction to Literature course. Thematic analysis was used for the observation and interview data, while exploratory data analysis was applied to the questionnaire responses. The findings revealed that the lecturer implemented various reader-response activities, such as personal reflection, written responses, interpretive freedom, and classroom discussion—encouraged students to analyze textual meaning, justify interpretations, and consider multiple perspectives. These are core aspects of critical thinking. However, some students remained passive or reluctant to express opinions. The lecturer addressed this by using scaffolding strategies and small-group discussions. Most students stated the strategy improved their text comprehension, confidence in sharing ideas, and class participation. Based on the findings, the study concludes that the reader-response strategy effectively supports the development of critical thinking in EFL literature classrooms when combined with appropriate instructional support.

Keywords

Critical thinking; EFL; literature teaching; reader response; student engagement

Full Text:

PDF

References

Boubekeur, S. (2021). Teaching Short Stories through the Use of the Reader-Response Theory: Second-Year Students at Dr. Moulay Tahar University-Saida. Arab World English Journal, 12(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.6

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Creswell, J. (2023). RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Hassan, H. S., Bajalani, F. R. H. Al, & Ismail, K. S. (2023). The Role of the Reader-Response Approach to Teaching Short Stories in Developing Students’ Critical Thinking in EFL Literature Classes: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 27(SpA), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.27.spa.26

Iskhak, I., Mujiyanto, J., & Hartono, R. (2020). A Review on Reader Response Approach to Teaching Literature at EFL Contexts. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 118. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p118

Kunjanman, S., & Aziz, A. A. (2021). Reader-Response Theory: A Systematic Literature Review. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(4), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i4.747

Moeljono, E. E., & Lintangsari, A. P. (2021). Investigating Indonesian EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking: Current State and Future. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5357

Nurhayati, S., & Erviana, Y. (2024). Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Dalam Presentasi Akademik: Evaluasi Dari Berbagai Aspek Kualitas Penyampaian dan Interaksi. Consilium: Education and Counseling Journal, 4(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.36841/consilium.v4i2.4688

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Qamar, F. (2016). Effectiveness of critical thinking skills for English literature study with reader response theory: Review of Literature. Journal of Arts and Humanities. https://www.theartsjournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/961

Rahimipour, S. (2021). Integrating Reader Response Theory into EFL Classroom at Farhangian University. AJELP: The Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 9(2), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol9.2.2.2021

Roen, D., & Karolides, N. (2005). Louise Rosenblatt: A Life in Literacy. The ALAN Review, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.21061/alan.v32i3.a.10

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Southern Illinois University Press.

Suarez, G. W. A., & Diva, C. (2022). Using Reader Response Strategy and Affective Learning Domain in Teaching Literature to Enhance Critical Thinking. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 3(4), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.53378/352938

Susanti, D., & Hernawati, C. (2022). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v10i1.12190

Woodruff, Amanda H., and Robert A. Griffin. "Reader Response in Secondary Settings: Increasing Comprehension through Meaningful Interactions with Literary Texts." Texas Journal of Literacy Education 5, no. 2 (2017): 108-116.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.