The Implementation of Student Peer-Feedback in Writing Hortatory Exposition Text

Erlika Argianti Karsudin

Abstract


This study reports on the implementation of student peer-feedback in writing hortatory exposition text, particularly at the eleventh grade in one of Senior High Schools in Banjar. Peer-Feedback is one of appropriate techniques to support students in learning writing. The writers adopted qualitative approach particularly a case study design as the research design. The writers conducted observation, interview to an English teacher and administered questionnaire for the students as well. In this case, the respondents were selected purposively. The results showed that the implementation of peer-feedback is useful to support and motivate the students to learn well. The students can be active in learning writing. In implementing peer-feedback, they can the students wrote, they analyzed their peer text. After that, they gave comments and revisions by giving circle and underline on their peer text, such as in the mechanics of writing, vocabulary and grammar error.Key words: writing, peer-feedback, hortatory exposition, perception

References


Abu-Jarad, A. M. (2008). Palestinian EFL intermediate and advanced learner perception about peer feedback in writing classes. Journal of Al Azhar University-Gaza, Humanities Sciences, 10(1), 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.alazhar.edu.ps/journal123/attachedFile.asp?seqq1=846.pdf.

Anderson, M. & Anderson, K. (1998). Text types in English 3. Malaysia: Macmillan.

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how text work. Laura Street Newton: Primary English Teaching Association.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, E. N. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to do design and evaluate research in education, (8thed). New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.

Galdi, M. & Likita, M. (2014). The relationship between senior secondary students’ perception and attitudes to performance in mathematics in maiduguri metropolitan, Borno state. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(2), 81-84. Retrieved from http://www.ijser.org/research-paper-publishing-february-2014.pdf.

Gedera, S. P. (2012). The dynamics of blog peer feedback in ESL classroom. Teaching English with technology, 12(4), 16-30. Retrieved from http://www.tewtjournal.org.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed). Cambridge: Pearson Longman.

Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing. USA and Canada: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press

Hyland, K. & Giuliana, D. (2009). Academic evaluation review genres in university settings. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Janssen, H. H. & Fernandes, M. J. (2012). Peer feedback: Quality and quantity in large groups. SEFI 40th Annual Conference, 23-26. Retrieved from http://www.sefi.be/conference-2012/Papers/Papers/101.pdf.

Lee, N. S. (2012). Written peer-feedback by EFL students: Praise, criticism and suggestion. Komaba Journal of English Education, 129-139. Retrieved from http://park.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/eigo/KJEE/129-139.pdf.

Lin, G, H, C. & Chien, P. S. (2009). An investigation into effectiveness of peer feedback. Journal of applied foreign language fortune institute of technology, 3(1), 79-87. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506179.pdf.

Liu, N. F. & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in higher education, 11(3), 279-290. Retrieved from http://www.edci.purdue.edu/ertmer/docs/AERA10_PF_SRL.pdf.

Mun, F. N., Foong, L. N. & Seng, H. N. (2007). Creative English workbook for SMA Year XI. Erlangga.

Rodriques, M. V. (2000). Perspetive of communiation, and communicative competence. Concept publishing company. New Delhi.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30. Retrieved from http://203.72.145.166/ELT/files/59-1-3.pdf.

Tsui, B. M. A. & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary l2 writers benefit from peer comments?.Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170. Retrieved from http://www.fe.hku.hk/curric/amytsui/bk_reviews/docs/Do_Secondary_L2_Writers_Benefit_from_Peer_Comments.pdf.

Wakabayashi, R. (2013). The effects of the peer feedback process on reviewers’ own writing. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 177-192. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/29656/175.

Yang, Y. & Meng, W. (2013). The effects of online feedback training on students’ text revision. Language Learning & Technology. 2(17), 220-238. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2013/yangmeng.pdf.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v2i1.1841

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

JEEP has been indexed in